PAYGO Tracker: FY 2020

Nov 20, 2019 | Budget Process

The first rule of getting out of a hole is to stop digging it deeper. Yet with deficits projected to exceed $1 trillion this fiscal year, lawmakers continue to regularly evade or ignore pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) budget rules requiring new spending and tax cuts to be offset.

The PAYGO Tracker will track ongoing and enacted legislation starting in Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 to determine the extent to which policymakers are abiding by PAYGO. We will focus on legislation that has a significant budgetary impact and receives a floor vote by at least one chamber of Congress.

Currently, PAYGO is enforced in three different ways. Rules in the House and Senate require all tax and mandatory spending legislation to be offset; the statutory PAYGO law requires policymakers to offset the five- and ten-year cost of any tax and mandatory spending changes in legislation over the course of a calendar year; and PAYGO principles and norms encourage policymakers to ensure legislation doesn't add to long-term deficits or rely on budget gimmicks, regardless of technicalities.

Our PAYGO Tracker will highlight efforts to waive, evade, cancel, or ignore PAYGO rules, the PAYGO law, or PAYGO principles. We will also show the scored cost or savings and total cost or savings for each bill, and we will include a paragraph description of the legislation and how policymakers are abiding by or circumventing PAYGO rules.

The tracker will be regularly updated and available at

PAYGO Tracker

Key: Waived=PAYGO rule was waived. Waived*=Global waiver from rules. not specific to PAYGO. Excluded=Excluded from PAYGO scorecard. Wiped=Wiped PAYGO scorecard clean. Cancelled=Cancelled PAYGO sequester. Violated=Violated PAYGO principles.

Disapproving IRS rule reinforcing the SALT deduction cap: S.J. Res. 50 is a Senate joint resolution that would disapprove of the IRS rule that combats attempts to circumvent the cap on state and local tax deductions. The IRS rule was meant to prevent states from labeling state tax payments as deductible charitable contributions. By cancelling the rule, the resolution would have allowed states to proceed with this strategy and result in reduced federal revenue, though it is unknown by how much. It would cost less than the $500 billion cost of fully repealing the cap. The resolution did not waive either Senate or statutory PAYGO rules but certainly violated PAYGO principles by increasing deficits. The resolution was voted down 43-52 in October.

Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2020, and Further Health Extenders Act of 2019: The Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2020, and Further Health Extenders Act of 2019 is a one-month continuing resolution to fund the government from November 21 to December 20 at current levels. The bill also includes a one-month extension of several health extenders at a cost of $426 million that is fully offset by an equivalent reduction in the Medicaid Improvement Fund and $1.1 billion increase in spending for the United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund that is not offset. Finally, the bill cancels a $7.6 billion rescission in highway funding that was included in the 2015 highway bill to artificially reduce costs after that bill's authorization expired. However, since highway spending is considered discretionary and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) did not count the rescission as cutting outlays before, this does not count as a spending increase. Overall, the bill is scored as costing $1.1 billion over ten years and would cost $1.3 billion including interest. The House Rules Committee provided a global waiver from House rules, including the House PAYGO rule, and the bill excludes its budgetary effects from the statutory PAYGO scorecard while shifting the small existing 2020 scorecard balance to 2021. The House passed the bill by a 231-192 vote.

The PAYGO Tracker will be regularly updated and available at